Skip to main content

R. Allen Stanford gets 110 years; victims representative calls Stanford a "dirty, rotten scoundrel"


TEXAS LAWYER









JUNE 14, 2012

R. Allen Stanford gets 110 years; victims representative calls Stanford a "dirty, rotten scoundrel"

Calling it “one of the most egregious frauds” to ever be presented to a jury, on June 14 Senior U.S. District Judge David Hittner sentenced 62-year-old financier R. Allen Stanford of Houston to 110 years in prison.

In March, a federal court jury found Stanford, former chairman of Houston’s Stanford Financial Group, guilty of 13 of 14 criminal counts against him. Jurors found him not guilty of one count of wire fraud. Stanford was charged in connection with an alleged conspiracy to defraud investors who bought about $7 billion in CDs sold through Stanford International Bank (SIB).

Stanford, dressed in a green prison suit, showed little reaction to the sentence Hittner delivered shortly after noon on June 14 in a large Houston courtroom packed with people who lost money after they bought CDs from SIB. Leaders of two groups of disgruntled investors asked Hittner to impose the maximum sentence of 230 years.

Jaime Escalona, a representative of Stanford victims from Latin America, told Hittner that Stanford was a “dirty, rotten scoundrel” while Angela Shaw Kogutt, director of the Stanford Victims Coalition, said Stanford committed an “inconceivably heinous crime” that “took our lives as we knew them.”

Hittner sentenced Stanford after criminal-defense attorney Ali Fazel told Hittner he should sentence Stanford to no more than 120 months in prison and federal prosecutor William Stelnach, of the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., sought the maximum of 230 years in prison.

Fazel, a partner in Scardino & Fazel in Houston, told Hittner that despite the government’s contention, Stanford Financial Group was not a Ponzi scheme, because the Stanford companies had made investments. Fazel said in 2008 and 2009 the troubled economy, not Stanford, was the proximate cause of the collapse of SFG.

Following Fazel’s argument, Stanford, who did not testify at trial, gave a 40-minute rambling, disjointed speech to Hittner prior to his sentencing, during which Stanford blamed the economic decline of his companies on a government receivership imposed on Feb. 17, 2009, and the “near worldwide economic collapse.” The government used “Gestapo tactics” in imposing the receivership, he told Hittner.

“I didn’t intend to — never did — to . . . personally defraud anyone,” Stanford told Hittner.
 He told Hittner he wasn’t asking for sympathy or forgiveness, but said, “I’m telling you in my heart, I didn’t run a Ponzi scheme.”

“Whether I was a scapegoat, whether I just happened to be the thing to be used to deflect, I don’t know. All I know is every day . . . I do put the blame on the government for what they did. . . . I feel bad for the people, the clients who got hurt, the employees,” Stanford said in court.

“I’ve been called a lot of things — arrogant, abrasive, son-of-a-gun, difficult and very opinionated, strong-willed — like anyone in life who’s achieved the same characteristics. I’m not a thief,” he told Hittner.

 Stelnach, deputy chief of the U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division’s Fraud Section, told Hittner that Stanford’s statement was “obscene,” and the Mexia native is “one of the greediest criminals to ever appear in a criminal case.”

“Mr. Stanford proclaimed himself a scapegoat. . . . He just showed one more time his deceit and complete lack of remorse . . .,” Stelnach said. “It was a blatant Ponzi scheme. Stanford International Bank was his personal ATM.”

Stelnach said, conservatively, SFG lost $5.9 billion. [See the sentencing memo.]
A gag order that bars Stanford’s defense team and prosecutors from commenting on any aspect of the case remains in effect. Hittner said he would not lift the gag order because of the pending criminal trial of Stanford’s three co-defendants. That trial is set for September.

-- Brenda Sapino Jeffreys


Popular posts from this blog

Vampire Squid Goldman Sachs rescues infamous autocrat Maduro of Venezuela

Two Vile Names, One Sweetheart Deal: Goldman Bails Out Maduro
May 31, 2017
The Vampire Squid rescues an infamous autocrat



Who says two amoral and corrupt institutions with diametrically opposing ideologies can't collaborate to sink even lower together?

RELATEDMatt Taibbi: The Vampire Squid Occupies Trump's White House
After running against Goldman as a candidate, Donald Trump licks the boots of the world's largest investment bank Goldman Sachs, infamous investment bank and symbol of international predatory capitalism, has made a devil's bargain with Nicolás Maduro, the infamous left-wing dictator of Venezuela who claims to despise companies just like Goldman. As Forbes writes: "What happened is that the Venezuelan Treasury owned some bonds issued by PDVSA, the national oil company. They sold those bonds to Goldman Sachs at a serious discount to face value." Maduro's authoritarian government has been rocked by protests this spring thanks to widespread econom…

Calamar Vampiro, Goldman, Ayuda a Déspota Maduro

Dos Nombres Horribles, Un Negocio Redondo: Goldman Ayuda a Maduro El Calamar Vampiro rescata al infame déspota
Goldman Sachs supuestamente compró $2.800 millones de los bonos emitidos por la empresa nacional Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA). Richard Drew/AP
Por Matt Taibbi
(Artículo traducido del inglés al español por COViSAL - covisal.blogspot.com)
31 de mayo, 2017
¿Quién diría que dos instituciones amorales y corruptas con ideologías diametralmente opuestas, no pueden colaborar para undirse aún más?
RELACIONADO Matt Taibbi: El Calamar Vampiro Ocupa La Casa Blanca de Trump Después de contender en contra de Goldman como candidato, Donald Trump le lame las botas al banco de inversión más grande del mundo
Goldman Sachs, un infame banco de inversión y símbolo internacional del capitalismo predador ha hecho un trato diabólico con Nicolás Maduro, el infame dictador izquierdista de Venezuela quien proclama despreciar a empresas como Goldman. De acuerdo al escrito de Forbes:
“Lo que ocurrió es que la …

COViSAL protesta acuerdo con Hunton y Williams LLP por $34 millones de dólares, de los cuales $8,5 millones son para abogados.

COViSAL
Por Restitutio

Traducción al español de la versión original en inglés
20 de septiembre, 2017
Secretaría del Tribunal United States District Court Northern District of Texas 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75242
ATN: Cámara delHonorable David Godbey
SEC Acción Civil: 3:09-CV-0298-N
Honorable Juez:
Le escribimos para expresar nuestra objeción y protesta sobre los acuerdos del Administrador Judicial, el Comité Oficial de Inversionistas de Stanford y otros, relacionados con el caso Stanford. Estos acuerdos generan millones de dólares en honorarios para los abogados y centavos para las familias afectadas. En esta instancia protestamos enfáticamente el acuerdo propuesto con Hunton y Williams LLP por $34 millones de dólares, de los cuales $8,5 millones son para honorarios de abogados.
Durante los últimos 8 años los ahorristas de Stanford han recibido menos del uno por ciento de sus pérdidas de las distribuciones anunciadas y han tenido que esperar casi un año por cada distribución. Al mismo t…