Skip to main content

Stanford gets 110 years in prison

Stanford Watch

The latest news on R. Allen Stanford and Stanford Financial Group

Stanford gets 110 years in prison

5 of 38 | Share 

R. Allen Stanford

By Ronnie Crocker
R. Allen Stanford’s speech Thursday to a judge and a courtroom full of aggrieved investors — a lengthy rationale for the collapse of his financial empire — apparently fell on deaf ears, as the disgraced businessman was sentenced to 110 years in federal prison.
Stanford, 62, took a sip of water and drew a deep breath after learning that, absent a successful appeal, he’ll never leave prison.
The highlight of Thursday’s two-hour hearing before U.S. District Judge David Hittner came when Stanford, graying and paunchy in dark green prison togs, rose with a fistful of papers to speak on his own behalf.
“I worked tirelessly, and honestly, to build a world-class, global financial-services company,” he said, then repeatedly laid the blame for its collapse at the feet of the U.S. government.
Receivers, he said, moved too quickly in February 2009 to close down his businesses and unload his assets in a “fire sale.” If left to continue to operate, he said, the business would have recovered from the recession and he would have been able to repay holders of billions of dollars worth of certificates of deposit issued by Stanford International Bank on the Caribbean island of Antigua.
As he has done since the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission moved against him, Stanford denied wrongdoing in the wide-ranging international fraud that a jury in March found was committed mostly through the CDs.
The government has estimated the size of the fraud at $5.9 billion.
“I am and will always be at peace with the way I conducted myself in business,” said Stanford, a Mexia native.
Twice, Stanford mentioned that he felt bad for the investors who lost money, his employees who lost their jobs and his own family members dragged into the affair. But it was not until the courtroom was clearing that he offered a direct apology.
“He had tears in his eyes and said, ‘I’m so sorry,’” victim Angela Shaw, one of two defrauded investors who also addressed Hittner’s court, recounted afterward. “But then he said, ‘This is wrong and you’ll have to sue the United States government. They did this.’”
The moment fell short of genuine contrition, Shaw said, and wound up confirming her view of Stanford’s “sociopathic behavior.”
At the conclusion of Stanford’s speech, federal prosecutor William Stellmach blasted it as “obscene.” He urged Hittner to assess the 230-year maximum sentence.
Defense attorney Ali Fazel had asked Hittner for no more than a 10-year term. When the judge announced the aggregate total for the 13 crimes Stanford was convicted on — conspiracy, wire and mail fraud, obstruction and money laundering — the sentence ran to 11 times that.
Hittner noted that it is unlikely the prisoner ever will be released.
The judge also approved a “money judgment” that holds Stanford personally liable for $5.9 billion.
Jaime Escalona, a defrauded investor who lives in Caracas, Venezuela, and Austin and spoke for Latin American investors, had also asked for the maximum. From his dais in the courtroom, he called Stanford “a dirty, rotten scoundrel.”
Afterward, he said he was glad, at least, that Stanford will likely never be free.
“We were hoping for the maximum,” he said, “to make an example.”

Popular posts from this blog

Vampire Squid Goldman Sachs rescues infamous autocrat Maduro of Venezuela

Two Vile Names, One Sweetheart Deal: Goldman Bails Out Maduro
May 31, 2017
The Vampire Squid rescues an infamous autocrat

Who says two amoral and corrupt institutions with diametrically opposing ideologies can't collaborate to sink even lower together?

RELATEDMatt Taibbi: The Vampire Squid Occupies Trump's White House
After running against Goldman as a candidate, Donald Trump licks the boots of the world's largest investment bank Goldman Sachs, infamous investment bank and symbol of international predatory capitalism, has made a devil's bargain with Nicolás Maduro, the infamous left-wing dictator of Venezuela who claims to despise companies just like Goldman. As Forbes writes: "What happened is that the Venezuelan Treasury owned some bonds issued by PDVSA, the national oil company. They sold those bonds to Goldman Sachs at a serious discount to face value." Maduro's authoritarian government has been rocked by protests this spring thanks to widespread econom…

Calamar Vampiro, Goldman, Ayuda a Déspota Maduro

Dos Nombres Horribles, Un Negocio Redondo: Goldman Ayuda a Maduro El Calamar Vampiro rescata al infame déspota
Goldman Sachs supuestamente compró $2.800 millones de los bonos emitidos por la empresa nacional Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA). Richard Drew/AP
Por Matt Taibbi
(Artículo traducido del inglés al español por COViSAL -
31 de mayo, 2017
¿Quién diría que dos instituciones amorales y corruptas con ideologías diametralmente opuestas, no pueden colaborar para undirse aún más?
RELACIONADO Matt Taibbi: El Calamar Vampiro Ocupa La Casa Blanca de Trump Después de contender en contra de Goldman como candidato, Donald Trump le lame las botas al banco de inversión más grande del mundo
Goldman Sachs, un infame banco de inversión y símbolo internacional del capitalismo predador ha hecho un trato diabólico con Nicolás Maduro, el infame dictador izquierdista de Venezuela quien proclama despreciar a empresas como Goldman. De acuerdo al escrito de Forbes:
“Lo que ocurrió es que la …

COViSAL protesta acuerdo con Hunton y Williams LLP por $34 millones de dólares, de los cuales $8,5 millones son para abogados.

Por Restitutio

Traducción al español de la versión original en inglés
20 de septiembre, 2017
Secretaría del Tribunal United States District Court Northern District of Texas 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75242
ATN: Cámara delHonorable David Godbey
SEC Acción Civil: 3:09-CV-0298-N
Honorable Juez:
Le escribimos para expresar nuestra objeción y protesta sobre los acuerdos del Administrador Judicial, el Comité Oficial de Inversionistas de Stanford y otros, relacionados con el caso Stanford. Estos acuerdos generan millones de dólares en honorarios para los abogados y centavos para las familias afectadas. En esta instancia protestamos enfáticamente el acuerdo propuesto con Hunton y Williams LLP por $34 millones de dólares, de los cuales $8,5 millones son para honorarios de abogados.
Durante los últimos 8 años los ahorristas de Stanford han recibido menos del uno por ciento de sus pérdidas de las distribuciones anunciadas y han tenido que esperar casi un año por cada distribución. Al mismo t…