Skip to main content

An Open Letter to the Joint Liquidators of SIBL - August 13, 2012


COALICION VICTIMAS DE STANFORD AMERICA LATINA (COViSAL)

An Open Letter to the Joint Liquidators of SIBL
August 13, 2012


Marcus Wide and Hugh Dickson
Joint Liquidators
Stanford International Bank Ltd.

Dear Mr. Wide and Mr. Dickson:

COViSAL's members are very disappointed that you chose to ignore our plea not to appeal Judge Godbey’s decision.

We also find inexcusable the fact that the order of your appointment as new Joint Liquidators by the Court in Antigua, dated May 12, 2011, did not mention the Agreement of Cooperation, which should have been signed by the previous Joint Liquidators and the U.S. Receiver in the second trimester of 2010. The purpose of the agreement was to make the recovery of our assets more expeditious and less costly.


It seems that our never-ending saga is being prolonged by design, to generate fees and expenses and to waste the remnants of our stolen savings in useless and unnecessary legal fights. You have already spent millions of dollars of our patrimony with your continued litigation against the U.S. Receiver and the U.S. Department of Justice. Now, you're confirming what Judge Godbey described in his Court Order of July 31, 2012 about your history of repeated interference with the U.S. Receiver. "… early in the action, without notice to the Receiver or the Canadian court, the Former Joint Liquidators entered one of the Stanford Entities in Canada and wiped its computer systems clean of information… the current Joint Liquidators have attempted numerous times to unseat the Receiver from his role as the recognized foreign representative in Canada."                                

The Judge continues, "Further, the Joint Liquidators have actively objected to criminal seizure proceedings by the U.S. Department of Justice in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland, and have taken affirmative steps to block the repatriation of Estate assets generally in the United Kingdom and Canada… the Joint Liquidators have proven to be extremely litigious and calculating in this Court, filing multiple notices of objection to the Receiver's requests in this and other Stanford [multi-district litigation] suits, and filing motions to pursue claims the Receiver was already pursuing. The Joint Liquidators have admitted that they seek funds first and foremost to fund their current operations, which include challenging the Receiver's authority worldwide, not to distribute to investor-victims and creditors." Judge Godbey said, this repeated interference with Janvey has "been the norm" and is "particularly worrying."                            

It is unacceptable that the Courts in Antigua and the United States have allowed you and the Receiver, who were named to prevent the squandering of the creditors' patrimony, to continue fighting for the assets - duplicating costs and efforts, and hindering the possibilities of a pro rata distribution of the victims’ patrimony.

Three and a half years have passed since our savings were stolen, and there is no end to the abuse. We ask that you focus your efforts on cooperatively and honestly coordinate the recovery of our stolen assets with the US Receiver, the Department of Justice, the SEC, and the Official Stanford Investors Committee. This cooperation would oblige the parties to share records and documents indispensable to successfully achieving third party lawsuits, it would compel you to implement only one “Process of Claims Certification,” and it would oblige you to elaborate joint reports to give the judicial process the transparency it lacks.

It is undeniable that the Stanford Case has shown a lack of ethics and morality. We are concerned that you, and the Receiver continue to be a part of the problem and not a part of the solution. Why prolong the agony of the victims?

You have a fiduciary duty to the investors/victims and creditors, and your decisions and actions must be carried out in consideration of the best interests of all of us, the Stanford’s victims. There must be accountability for the money spent in pointless litigation, and unnecessary expenditures. We will seek redress for the economic loss and damage from acts and omissions against our interests and rights.

Once again, COViSAL demands that you comply with Judge David Godbey’s Court Order. Arrogance must be abandoned in order to establish a Cooperation Agreement with the U.S. Receiver without any further delay - for the benefit of all Stanford’s victims.

The rights of the victims should prevail over the judicial manipulations, and conscience must be the instrument to impart justice. May God bless the thousands of innocent families - victims of a fraud that still continues.



Jaime R. Escalona
On behalf of COViSAL

Popular posts from this blog

Comentarios de abogados al mensaje de COViSAL "El Tiempo es de Vital Importancia"

Comentarios de abogados al mensaje de COViSAL "El Tiempo es de Vital Importancia..." A solicitud de numerosos miembros y seguidores de COViSAL, se presentan a continuación los comentarios de los abogados al correo electrónico titulado "Time is of the Essence...", enviado el 6 de febrero de 2024.   Primer comentario:   “Me parece que las primeras 6 de sus “preguntas” pueden responderse en gran medida revisando las numerosas actualizaciones en el sitio web de la Sindicatura. Las otras seis preguntas involucran tanto consideraciones estratégicas como incógnitas, tales como lo que un tribunal en particular va a decidir, esto hace que las preguntas sean incontestables de una manera significativa.   Esto también me parece un intento por parte de Escalona de mantenerse relevante.”   Segundo comentario:   "Estoy de acuerdo"   Tercer comentario:   "Sí. No creo que él ya tenga muchos seguidores. Quizás un pequeño grupo en Venezuela”

Respuesta de COViSAL a los comentarios de Little, Sadler y Snyder al correo electrónico Time is of the Essence

Respuesta de COViSAL a los comentarios de Little, Sadler y Snyder al correo electrónico Time is of the Essence   Jaime R. Escalona <jaenrodes@gmail.com> 14:17 8 de febrero 2024 a Little, Sadler, Snyder   Estimados señores Little, Sadler y Snyder: Les escribo en respuesta a sus comentarios sobre mi carta, "El tiempo es esencial: libere ahora los fondos del acuerdo de Stanford para las víctimas que sufren". Si bien entiendo su perspectiva sobre algunos puntos, creo que un enfoque colaborativo centrado en la transparencia, la claridad y el bienestar de las víctimas es crucial. Abordar las preocupaciones sobre la transparencia: Mi carta planteó preocupaciones válidas sobre información clara y fácilmente disponible para las familias afectadas. Si bien el sitio web de la Sindicatura ofrece actualizaciones, la comunicación adicional que aborde preguntas específicas, como las planteadas en mi carta, puede aliviar significativamente la ansiedad y generar confi

Exigencia de COViSAL a Grant Thornton para que después de catorce (14) años de ineficacia, presente un reporte claro con resultados y el plan de cierre de la Liquidación del SIBL.

28 de junio, 2023 Mark McDonald Liquidador Conjunto Stanford International Bank Limited - in Liquidation Asunto : Exigencia de COViSAL a Grant Thornton para que después de catorce (14) años de ineficacia, presente un reporte claro con resultados y el plan de cierre de la Liquidación del SIBL.    Estimado Sr. McDonald: Yo, Jaime R. Escalona , en mi carácter de fundador de COViSAL, coalición que agrupa más de 1500 sobrevivientes de la debacle del Stanford Financial Group; por medio de esta carta le transmito el disgusto de sus miembros por su siete (7) meses de silencio y la exigencia que me han hecho para que le solicite un informe detallado de los planes y estrategias en la conclusión de los litigios pendientes, cierre de la Liquidación del Stanford International Bank Limited ("SIBL") y distribución de los fondos restantes. Es obvio que recuperaciones adicionales por medio de litigios son inciertas. El litigio principal contra el Toronto Dominion Bank en Canadá por $4,50