Skip to main content

Court Says Receiver Must Unravel Ponzi Assets





Thursday, August 02, 2012Last Update: 9:51 AM PT


Court Says Receiver Must Unravel Ponzi Assets

By DAVID LEE

     DALLAS (CN) - A federal judge ruled against Antiguan court-appointed liquidators of convicted Ponzi schemer R. Allen Stanford's assets, finding that American court-appointed receiver Ralph Janvey is in charge.

     On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge David Godbey only granted conditional, limited relief to Nigel Hamilton-Smith and Peter Wastell, who were appointed as receiver-managers of the Stanford International Bank by the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court in the High Court of Justice of Antigua and Barbuda in February of 2009.

     Two months later, the men filed for recognition in Dallas Federal Court under Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The duo have been jockeying with Janvey, a Dallas-based attorney, over the collection and payment of Ponzi scheme assets since.

     Godbey only granted the joint liquidators "foreign nonmain" recognition because he concluded the Stanford entities' "center of main interest" was the United States, not Antigua.

     "Stanford employees managed and directed the [certificate of deposit] enterprise from the United States with no meaningful input from Antigua," Godbey wrote. "Although SIB, the issuing bank, was chartered and registered in Antigua, Stanford and [James] Davis controlled it - with assistance from [Laura] Pendergest-Holt - from various places within the United States ... Antiguan employees were excluded from decisions regarding SIB's self-professed primary business: CD-proceed investments."

     Specifically, Godbey limits Hamilton-Smith and Wastell to "the examination of witnesses [and] the taking of evidence or the delivery of information concerning [SIB's] assets, affairs, rights, obligations or liabilities."

     He was particularly concerned about the duo's history of repeated interference with Janvey.

     "For example, early on in the action, without notice to the Receiver or the Canadian court, the Former Joint Liquidators entered one of the Stanford Entities in Canada and wiped its computer systems clean of information," Godbey wrote. "Second, the current Joint Liquidators have attempted numerous times to unseat the Receiver from his role as the recognized foreign representative in Canada." Godbey continues: "Further, the Joint Liquidators have actively objected to criminal seizure proceedings by the U.S. Department of Justice in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland, and have taken affirmative steps to block the repatriation of Estate assets generally in the United Kingdom and Canada. Fourth, the Joint Liquidators have proven to be extremely litigious and calculating in this Court, filing multiple notices of objection to the Receiver's requests in this and other Stanford [multi-district litigation] suits, and filing motions to pursue claims the Receiver was already pursuing. The Joint Liquidators have admitted that they seek funds first and foremost to fund their current operations, which include challenging the Receiver's authority worldwide, not to distribute to investor-victims and creditors."

     Godbey said this repeated interference with Janvey has "been the norm" and is "particularly worrying."

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/08/02/48951.htm

Popular posts from this blog

COViSAL protesta acuerdo con Hunton y Williams LLP por $34 millones de dólares, de los cuales $8,5 millones son para abogados.

COViSAL
Por Restitutio

Traducción al español de la versión original en inglés
20 de septiembre, 2017
Secretaría del Tribunal United States District Court Northern District of Texas 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75242
ATN: Cámara delHonorable David Godbey
SEC Acción Civil: 3:09-CV-0298-N
Honorable Juez:
Le escribimos para expresar nuestra objeción y protesta sobre los acuerdos del Administrador Judicial, el Comité Oficial de Inversionistas de Stanford y otros, relacionados con el caso Stanford. Estos acuerdos generan millones de dólares en honorarios para los abogados y centavos para las familias afectadas. En esta instancia protestamos enfáticamente el acuerdo propuesto con Hunton y Williams LLP por $34 millones de dólares, de los cuales $8,5 millones son para honorarios de abogados.
Durante los últimos 8 años los ahorristas de Stanford han recibido menos del uno por ciento de sus pérdidas de las distribuciones anunciadas y han tenido que esperar casi un año por cada distribución. Al mismo t…

COViSAL Estatus caso Stanford a Diciembre 2018

COViSAL
For Restitution
___________________________________
23 de diciembre, 2017
Estimados amigos:
Anexo un resumen del estatus del caso Stanford en USA y en Antigua.
ADMINISTRACION JUDICIAL DEL STANFORD FINANCIAL GROUP, U.S.A. (Liderada por el síndico Ralph Janvey, su abogado líder Kevin Sadler, su agente de distribución Gilardi & Co., y los abogados del comité oficial de inversionistas)
1.Recuperaciones - $407,8 millones (al 30 de abril, 2017)
2.Honorarios profesionales y gastos - $195,8 millones (al 30 de abril 2017)
3.Distribuciones a depositantes - $94,2 millones 
Hasta la fecha hemos tenido cuatro distribuciones oficiales:
a) Primera distribución interina de $55 millones (de dinero en efectivo disponible en el patrimonio) fue aprobada el 30 de mayo, 2013; 16 listas de pagos fueron publicadas desde el 20 de agosto 2013 hasta el 27 de abril 2017. A la fecha han distribuido $41,2 millones del total y todavía hay depositantes por recibir su pago de esta distribución. 
b) Segunda distribuci…

COViSAL protests the proposed settlement with Hunton & Williams LLP for $34 million, of which $8.5 million is for attorney’s fees.

COViSAL
For Restitution
___________________________
September 20, 2017
Clerk of the Court United States District Court Northern District of Texas 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75242
ATTN: Chambers of the Honorable David Godbey
SEC Civil Action: 3:09-CV-0298-N
Your Honor,
We write to you in order to express our objection and protest the settlements by the U.S. Receiver, the Official Stanford Investors Committee, and others related to Stanford’s case. These settlements generate millions of dollars in fees for attorneys and only pennies for the families affected. In this instance we strongly protest the proposed settlement with Hunton & Williams LLP for $34 million, of which $8.5 million is for attorney’s fees.
During the past 8 years Stanford’s depositors have received less than one percent of losses from announced distributions while being subject to a waiting period of almost a year per distribution.  At the same time, they have to endure a lack of response to inquiries they make to the r…